Post by JMB99"Freeview isn’t going anywhere anytime soon but needs more HD channels
Anyone predicting the imminent death of terrestrial TV needs to think again.
The Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer made it clear recently she had no
intentions of allowing Freeview to be switched off."
https://cleanfeed.thetvroom.com/19268/opinion/freeview-isnt-going-anywhe
re-anytime-soon-but-needs-more-hd-channels/
"More HD" is a technology change though, assuming it means (as it must,
unless they get back the stolen channels - fat chance of that) less SD -
or, as all but UK call it, more T2 means less T1.
I have four or five at least working - and used - T1 receivers, and only
one T2 (and that only because a distress purchase when the ASDA didn't
_have_ any T1-only ones); I'm sure I'm far from alone, many having T1
only.
From the above article:
"The bigger risk to Freeview is that without more HD it simply will
become a legacy service.
It’s time to contemplate making the technical changes to Freeview to
allow more HD."
I challenge the "legacy" claim: I find, even when watching via my T2
receiver, I watch a fair amount of SD, and even when on HD channels,
rarely notice the extra detail available. (I notice the subtitles look
different.)
(I presume "technical changes" is only bandwidth/channel reallocations;
if they're talking about _further_ changes beyond T2, then that's a
downer too.)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)***@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
Mike Jackson |\ _,,,---,,_
and Squeak /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Shame there's no snooze button
[1998] |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'- on a cat who wants breakfast
zzz '---''(_/--' `-'\_)